In legal doctrine, the concept of vxxlence is divided into two forms. On one hand, there is the vis compulsiva, the will-bending vxxlence, which manipulates the victim in such a way that it no longer follows its own will. But why should I make the effort of bending at first, when there is the possibility of will-breaking vxxlence, which completely denies the victim to form his own will at all?! And this victim is definitely broken earlier than my whip...
Information
Would you like to leave your comment? Please Login to your account to leave comments. Don't have an account? You can create a free account now.
